Adherence to Immunosuppressants among Adult Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation (Allo-HSCT): A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The level of adherence to drug therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) can affect the patient's outcome, and poor adherence is one of the factors in first-year mortality after HSCT. Material and Methods: This study assessed adherence to cyclosporine and prednisolone as the immunosuppressant regimen in 110 post-HSCT patients (> 18 years). Demographic characteristics, clinical information, and cyclosporine levels were obtained. A validated Persian medication adherence scale was used to assess adherence to cyclosporine and prednisolone. Results: For 110 patients, the calculated mean of the total score of cyclosporine and prednisolone was 7.73 ± 0.62 and 7.63 ± 0.73, respectively. Poor adherence to medication in this population was 27.7% and 22.7% to prednisolone and cyclosporine, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between adherence total score and cyclosporine levels at the third- and fourth-month post-transplant (r = 0.52, P < 0.001 and r = 0.60, P = 0.001). In the first, second, and third months, the mean of cyclosporine levels in the high adherence level was higher than the moderate and poor adherence levels. Additionally, there was an association between adherence score and the level of cyclosporine. One score increase in adherence scale on average increased cyclosporine level by 34.48 ng/ml. Conclusion: In this study, medication non-adherence was high, which indicates the need for more careful monitoring of post-HSCT patients' medication use. This is even more crucial currently since it has been confirmed that adherence can affect cyclosporine levels as the most effective immunosuppressant agent in preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

Imatinib Efficacy, Safety and Resistance in Iranian Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Review of Literature.

Background: Imatinib is the gold standard in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Resistance to imatinib is interfering with patients' responses and their survivals. Materials and Methods: We designed a systematic search to find relevant studies by applying appropriate keywords in PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, Ovid, ProQuest, Science direct and Google scholar for English studies. We also investigated the aforementioned terms' correspondence in Magiran, Scientific information database (SID) and Google scholar for Persian articles. Results: 25 studies were selected for final analysis. Reported hematologic responses from adult studies ranged 86-99% and major molecular responses were estimated in 38.84% of our patients within 12 months of treatment. The most frequent reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were edema (n=5 studies, 100%) and fatigue and nausea (n=4 studies, 80%); ADR per capita ratio was 1.46. Only one study informed ADRs in pediatrics demonstrating 93% of patients experienced ADRs after receiving imatinib. Most of the Studies (n=4, 67% from 7 studies) considered BCR/ABL point mutation as main reason of imatinib resistance. Drug-binding site and P-loop regions were two common sites for BCR/ABL point mutation. Conclusion: Imatinib as the first line treatment for CML has been associated with proper and durable responses in Iranian adults and children CML patients. Moreover, Imatinib life-threatening adverse effects were reported uncommon. Various responses to modified regimens have been reported in resistant patients; therefore, individualized treatment based on mutation type could be recommended.

Utilization Evaluation of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine (GARDASIL®) in Iran; A Cross-Sectional Study.

Vaccination against HPV seems to be a good approach for prevention of cervical cancer and genital warts. But in Iran we are confronted with lack of evidence for its cost-effectiveness whereas its consumption is dramatically increasing. This was a cross- sectional study. We used a questionnaire including 5 sections as follows; Patients demographic information, Patients medical history, Pregnancy and lactation considerations, Gardasil prescription characteristics and HPV infection characteristics. Prescriber with adherence to guideline were defined as those prescribing Gardasil for correct age range and indication with accurate dosage and administration. Descriptive statistics for variables was shown by frequency (percent) or mean (± SD) and evaluation of relation between categorical variables was performed by using Chi-square test. Total 566 Gardasil recipients participated in the study. There were mostly female with mean age of 28.1 (± 6.68). For 128 (22.6%) participants Gardasil prescribed correctly considering both age range (9-26 years) and indication (prophylactic). From this group, 80 participants (14.1%/566) have received accurate Gardasil dosage and interval (prescriber had adherence to guideline). Patients' out of pocket payment in guidelines adherent prescriptions was a seventh of total costs obtained from 566 consumers. Gynecologists significantly prescribed for prophylaxis higher than other specialties (p-value = 0.01). Prescribers' practice in administrating Gardasil is obviously not appropriate and it is imposing burdensome cost to community and government. On the other hand, we have encountered with increasing rate of its use in Iran in past years. Therefore, we are in urgent need for appropriate interventions in national level and prompt supervision to regulate Gardasil consumption.

Factors Affecting the Incidence and Severity of Oral Mucositis Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Background: Patients who receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) experience several complications that oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent symptom. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis and treatment strategies for established OM. Materials and Methods: We included 173 adult patients who received autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in this study. The World Health Organization oral toxicity scale was used to assess the severity of OM. Patients received two prophylactic regimens: regimen 1 contained nystatin, chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and amphotericin B. Regimen 2 contained nystatin and povidone iodine. 70 patients (40.5%) received the first prophylaxis regimen, 89 patients (51.4%) received the second prophylaxis regimen and the remaining 14 patients (8.1%) were not adherence to the use of the mouthwashes and were excluded from the analysis. Results: OM was detected in 60.7% of patients with mean (SD) age of 38.1±14.6 years. Multivariate analysis showed that only the female gender and the prophylactic regimen were the significant predictors of OM. Conclusion: We found that addition of amphotericin B and chlorhexidine, to the nystatin and povidone iodine resulted in a significant beneficial effect in prevention OM.

Prescribing Pattern and Prescription-writing Quality of Antineoplastic Agents in the Capital City of a Middle-income Developing Country.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer is a global health concern with growing incidence worldwide. Chemotherapy is the main treatment modality in many malignancies. This study aimed at evaluation of antineoplastic prescribing pattern and prescription-writing quality in the capital city of Iran. METHODS: All dispensed chemotherapy prescriptions by four main authorized pharmacies in Tehran during 1 month were targeted. Prescriptions with no antineoplastic medications or written by specialties other than oncology-related fields were excluded from the study. From the total 10,944 eligible prescriptions, 2736 (25%) prescriptions were selected randomly for data extraction. FINDINGS: Total 5784 antineoplastic medications were written by 239 physicians; most of them were adult hematologist-oncologist (69.0%) and male (86.6%). Each prescription contained an average of 1.8 (±0.9) antineoplastic medications. The most widely prescribed antineoplastic agents were cyclophosphamide (16.2%), fluorouracil (15.2%), doxorubicin (12.8%), and oxaliplatin (11.0%). The quality of prescription writing was poor; diagnosis, drug dosing, treatment schedule, and instructions were mostly absent. Sixty percent of drugs were written in brand names. CONCLUSION: The prescribing writing quality was poor and patients were at great risk of medication errors. Prompt action including policies and educational strategies should be taken to assure effective and safe patient treatment with antineoplastic medications.

High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients and Its Adverse Outcome.

Background: Although several studies have supported a preventive and therapeutic role of vitamin D (Vit D) for different types of cancers, we face insufficient documentation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). So, we examined whether the serum calcidiol (25(OH)D) levels at the time of induction therapy have any impact on response and relapse in AML patients. Materials and Methods: Blood samples were collected from 65 patients on days 0 and 28th of treatment to evaluate serum concentration of 25(OH)D and its effects on complete remission (CR) achievement, relapse rate and hospitalization length. Results: Of the 65 patients who were included in the study, 38 were male (58.5%) and 27 were female (41.5%). Median age at the time of treatment was 37 years (range 15-68). 6% of the participants were older than 60 years. In regard to 25(OH)D levels, 81.5% of AML patients were deficient (levels <20 ng/ml). There was a significant difference in CR between patients with sufficient and deficient level of 25(OH)D. Deficient patients had longer length of hospitalization than those with sufficient levels. Also Vitamin D deficient patients had higher serum ALP levels. The mean level of 25(OH)D on treatment day 28th in our study was significantly lower than the baseline value. Conclusion: The results of the study showed that serum 25(OH)D levels deficiency was highly prevalent among Iranian AML patients. Furthermore, higher Vit D levels in AML patients were associated with better outcome in these patients.

Validity and Reliability Assessment of the Persian Version of Therapy-Related Symptom Checklist.

Therapy-related symptom checklist for children (TRSC-C) was developed as a symptom assessment tool in children receiving chemotherapy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of TRSC-C. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2013-2014 in Tehran, Iran. TRSC-C was translated using backward-forward approach. The content validity, face validity, and comprehensiveness were investigated based on the opinion of experts. The item content validity index (I-CVI) and scale content validity index (S-CVI) were calculated by the mean approach and inter-rater agreement. The scale was revised based on the comments from a team of five experts, after which it was evaluated by an additional group of four experts. To assess the inter-rater reliability, two raters filled the scale with 29 and 30 patients in the outpatient clinic of Hazrat-e Ali Asghar Hospital. The Cronbach's alpha was calculated and factor analysis was performed. The scores of content validity were analyzed in Excel. Other statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 20.0. Based on the initial assessment, the S-CVI with less conservative approach was 60% for clarity, 33% for relevancy, and 60% for simplicity. After revising the scale, the S-CVI reached 100%. The comprehensiveness and face validity of the scale were appropriate. The scale was inter-rater reliable and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.803. Eleven subscales were found in the TRSC-C. It is concluded that the Persian TRSC-C is a valid and reliable tool for measuring children symptoms. Availability of a valid and reliable checklist is a fundamental step in monitoring the symptoms of patients while receiving chemotherapy.

Calcitriol for Oral Mucositis Prevention in Patients With Fanconi Anemia Undergoing Hematopoietic SCT: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Fanconi anemia is a rare inherited aplastic anemia, which is cured only by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). One of the most debilitating complications of high-dose chemotherapy regimen before HSCT is oral mucositis (OM), which occurs frequently in this population. Vitamin D has identified immunoregulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant role. This study was designed to examine the efficacy of vitamin D in the prevention of OM in patients with Fanconi anemia undergoing allogenic HSCT. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. They received either calcitriol (0.025 µg) or placebo capsule once daily, from the first day of chemotherapy schedule for 14 consecutive days. Incidence of OM was assessed as the primary outcome. Moreover, the association of baseline vitamin D level with OM was evaluated. In this study, calcitriol did not change OM incidence (P = 1) and severity (P = 0.54) significantly; however, a significant association of baseline vitamin D level with OM complete resolution was found (P = 0.03; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01). In conclusion, we did not find considerable benefits of calcitriol in the prevention of OM. However, further studies with bigger sample size and different calcitriol supplementation schedules are needed to confirm these findings.

Is 'self-medication' a useful term to retrieve related publications in the literature? A systematic exploration of related terms.

BACKGROUND: Self-Medication (SM), i.e. using medications to treat oneself, is a major concern for health researchers and policy makers. The terms "self medication" or "self-medication" (SM terms) have been used to explain various concepts while several terms have also been employed to define this practice. Hence, retrieving relevant publications would require exhaustive literature screening. So, we assessed the current situation of SM terms in the literature to improve the relevancy of search outcomes. METHODS: In this Systematic exploration, SM terms were searched in the 6 following databases and publisher's portals till April 2012: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google scholar, ScienceDirect, and Wiley. A simple search query was used to include only publications with SM terms. We used Relative-Risk (RR) to estimate the probability of SM terms use in related compared to unrelated publications. Sensitivity and specificity of SM terms as keywords in search query were also calculated. Relevant terms to SM practice were extracted and their Likelihood Ratio positive and negative (LR+/-) were calculated to assess their effect on the probability of search outcomes relevancy in addition to previous search queries. We also evaluated the content of unrelated publications. All mentioned steps were performed in title (TI) and title or abstract (TIAB) of publications. RESULTS: 1999 related and 1917 unrelated publications were found. SM terms RR was 4.5 in TI and 2.1 in TIAB. SM terms sensitivity and specificity respectively were 55.4% and 87.7% in TI and 84.0% and 59.5% in TIAB. "OTC" and "Over-The-Counter Medication", with LR+ 16.78 and 16.30 respectively, provided the most conclusive increase in the probability of the relevancy of publications. The most common unrelated SM themes were self-medication hypothesis, drug abuse and Zoopharmacognosy. CONCLUSIONS: Due to relatively low specificity or sensitivity of SM terms, relevant terms should be employed in search queries and clear definitions of SM applications should be applied to improve the relevancy of publications.

Anti-tuberculosis drugs adverse reactions: a review of the Iranian literature.

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) treatment, in particular therapy for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), is associated with toxicities and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews Iranian literature reporting ADRs which occurred during tuberculosis treatment. English language papers were sourced from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Ovid and Proquest, with Google Scholar searched for Persian language articles. Reported ADRs, proportion of patients with ADRs, risk factors and determinants, as well as the characteristics of the studies were reviewed. 21 articles were included; about 60% of them were in English and three included patients with MDR-TB. The ratio of ADR per capita was 1.9 (in 6 studies) and 33.63% of patients developed an ADR (in 7 studies). Hepatitis (2.5 - 45.3%) was reported in nearly all of the studies. The mean time from initiation of medication to development of hepatitis ranged from 4.67 to 25.25 days (in 6 studies). Most cases of mortality were due to hepatotoxicity. Except for comorbidities and female gender, other risk factors such as HIV and length of hospitalization were only reported in one article. EXPERT OPINION: The pattern of ADRs in Iranian articles was found to be similar to many other studies in the present review. We suggest that future studies resolve the confounding factors in this area that are mentioned in this review.

A review of medication errors in iran: sources, underreporting reasons and preventive measures.

Medication error (ME) is the most common preventable cause of adverse drug events which negatively affects patient safety. Inadequate, low-quality studies plus wide estimation variations in ME from developing countries including Iran, decreases the reliability of ME evaluations. To clarify sources, underreporting reasons and preventive measures of MEs, we reviewed Iran current available literature. We searched Scopus, WOS, PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCOHOST and Persian databases (IranMedex, and SID) up to October 2012. Two authors independently selected and one reviewed and extracted data. Results reported by more than 30% of studies considered as the most important topics. Finally 25 articles were included. All study designs were cross-sectional (except for two interventional studies) and in hospital settings. Nursing staff and students were the most observed populations. Individual factor, with "inadequate knowledge of medication" as its most frequent reason, were the mostly reported source of MEs. Fear and reporting process were two most important reporting barriers. The sense of being reprimanded and ignoring to report respectively were their most frequent factors. Anti-infectives were the most frequent drugs involved in MEs. Preventive measures were varied and reporting of their effectiveness was inconsistent. There are still many research gaps which need to be explored by further studies. Based on our findings, further researches may be focused on design, implementation, and evaluation of a ME reporting system as groundwork, assessing systems-related factors to ME alongside individual factors and evaluating the effectiveness of preventive measures for MEs in trials.

Bibliographic search of publication patterns in rational use of drugs in Iran: a systematic approach.

Inappropriate use of drugs is a widespread problem with serious consequences such as increased adverse drug reaction and antimicrobial resistance. Proper interventions would have important financial and public health benefits. Several studies have been performed about Rational Drug Use (RUD) in Iran. To provide a picture of researches were done about RUD and highlight the existing gaps in practice in Iran, a systematic search was conducted by reviewing all papers (English and Persian) found by searching keywords in Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Proquest, International Pharmaceutical Abstract (IPA), SID, Iran Medex and MagIran. Retrieved articles were extracted in Access form and exported to Excel for further analysis. After excluding duplicate and irrelevant articles, 466 related articles were remained. Number of publications increased dramatically after 2001. About 73% of studies were cross-sectional. Evaluation of prescribing pattern (15%), self-medication (11.3%) and adverse drug reaction (9.1%) were among the top topics which were studied. Despite an increasing trend in RUD publications in Iran, still large gaps remain to be investigated. Knowing the existing gaps is crucial for policy makers to make investments to solve the problems.

Is supplementation efficacious in maintaining adequate plasma levels of vitamin a and e for thalassemic patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Thalassemia along with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can lead to major oxidative stress. Vitamins A and E are antioxidants which protect membrane from lipid peroxidation. We sought to determine for the first time, whether vitamins A and E supplementation is efficacious in maintaining or increasing plasma level of these vitamins in thalassemic children undergoing HSCT. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 50 children with ß-thalassemia major hospitalized for HSCT. Patients took a daily multivitamin. Plasma vitamins A and E levels were measured at four different times: on admission, HSCT day (day 0), day 7 and day 14 after HSCT. Findings : Plasma vitamin A and E were abnormal on admission in most patients (62.0% and 60.0% respectively). Ratio of patient with normal to abnormal plasma level of the vitamins improved from baseline to a peak on day 7 then deteriorated afterward until day 14. There was an increasingly positive correlation between daily oral intake and plasma vitamin A at different times, but plasma vitamin E showed inverse correlation at first which tended towards no correlation subsequently. In multivariate analysis, supplementation significantly changed plasma level of vitamin A at different measurement time (P=0.001) within study subjects. But, plasma level of vitamin E showed no significant difference (P=0.2). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that oral supplementation could have beneficial effects due to increasing plasma vitamin A level and preventing plasma vitamin E depletion.

A bibliometric study of publication patterns in rational use of medicines in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of drugs is commonly observed in health care system throughout the world especially in developing countries. The consequences of irrational use of drugs are enormous for patients and communities. Proper interventions would have important financial and public health benefits. Several studies have been performed about rational use of drugs in Iran. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess scientific output on rational use of drugs in Iran using a bibliometric analysis of publications. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for finding all papers (English and Persian) using Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Proquest, International Pharmaceutical Abstract and Persian databases including SID, Iran Medex and MagIran. Retrieved articles were categorized by research topics and year of publication. Impact Factor of the journals, citation analysis of first authors, most cited topics and average citations per item were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 668 articles were retrieved from all search engines after excluding irrelevant, 466 articles were included in the review. Number of publications increased dramatically after 2001(more than 10 times). Evaluation of prescribing pattern (15%), self-medication (11.3%) and adverse drug reaction (9.1%) were among the most studied topics. From the total of 165 journals, 60 of them had Impact factors and 125 articles were published in these journals. Antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reaction were the most cited topic. CONCLUSIONS: Publication of articles on rational use of drugs research in Iran has undergone an important increase during last decade. Further analysis of research outputs is necessary to achieve rational use of medicines goal.

Types and severity of medication errors in Iran; a review of the current literature.

Medication error (ME) is the most common single preventable cause of adverse drug events which negatively affects patient safety. ME prevalence is a valuable safety indicator in healthcare system. Inadequate studies on ME, shortage of high-quality studies and wide variations in estimations from developing countries including Iran, decreases the reliability of ME evaluations. In order to clarify the status of MEs, we aimed to review current available literature on this subject from Iran. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCOHOST and also Persian databases (IranMedex, and SID) up to October 2012 to find studies on adults and children about prescription, transcription, dispensing, and administration errors. Two authors independently selected and one of them reviewed and extracted data for types, definitions and severity of MEs. The results were classified based on different stages of drug delivery process. Eighteen articles (11 Persian and 7 English) were included in our review. All study designs were cross-sectional and conducted in hospital settings. Nursing staff and students were the most frequent populations under observation (12 studies; 66.7%). Most of studies did not report the overall frequency of MEs aside from ME types. Most of studies (15; 83.3%) reported prevalence of administration errors between 14.3%-70.0%. Prescribing error prevalence ranged from 29.8%-47.8%. The prevalence of dispensing and transcribing errors were from 11.3%-33.6% and 10.0%-51.8% respectively. We did not find any follow up or repeated studies. Only three studies reported findings on severity of MEs. The most reported types of and the highest percentages for any type of ME in Iran were administration errors. Studying ME in Iran is a new area considering the duration and number of publications. Wide ranges of estimations for MEs in different stages may be because of the poor quality of studies with diversity in definitions, methods, and populations. For gaining better insights into ME in Iran, we suggest studying sources, underreporting of, and preventive measures for MEs.

A bibliometric study of publication patterns in rational use of medicines in Iran / Estudio bibliométrico de los patrones de publicación en uso racional de medicamentos en Irán

Background: Inappropriate use of drugs is commonly observed in health care system throughout the world especially in developing countries. The consequences of irrational use of drugs are enormous for patients and communities. Proper interventions would have important financial and public health benefits. Several studies have been performed about rational use of drugs in Iran. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess scientific output on rational use of drugs in Iran using a bibliometric analysis of publications. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for finding all papers (English and Persian) using Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Proquest, International Pharmaceutical Abstract and Persian databases including SID, Iran Medex and MagIran. Retrieved articles were categorized by research topics and year of publication. Impact Factor of the journals, citation analysis of first authors, most cited topics and average citations per item were analyzed. Results: A total of 668 articles were retrieved from all search engines after excluding irrelevant, 466 articles were included in the review. Number of publications increased dramatically after 2001(more than 10 times). Evaluation of prescribing pattern (15%), self-medication (11.3%) and adverse drug reaction (9.1%) were among the most studied topics. From the total of 165 journals, 60 of them had Impact factors and 125 articles were published in these journals. Antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reaction were the most cited topic. Conclusion: Publication of articles on rational use of drugs research in Iran has undergone an important increase during last decade. Further analysis of research outputs is necessary to achieve rational use of medicines goal (AU)

Antecedentes: El uso inapropiado de medicamentos es frecuentemente observado en el sistema sanitario en todo el mundo, especialmente en países desarrollados. Las consecuencias del uso irracional de medicamento son enormes para los pacientes y la comunidad. Intervenciones adecuadas podrían tener importantes beneficios financieros y de salud pública. Se han realizado diversos estudios sobre el uso racional de medicamentos en Irán. Objetivo: el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la producción científica sobre uso racional de medicamentos en Irán utilizando un análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática localizando todos los artículos (inglés y persa) usando Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Proquest, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, y bases de datos persas como SID, Iran Medex and MagIran. Los artículos recuperados se clasificaron por temas de investigación y año de publicación. Se analizaron los factores de impacto de las revistas, las citaciones de los primeros autores, los asuntos más citados, y la media de citaciones por ítem. Resultados: Se recuperaron un total de 668 artículos de todos los motores de búsqueda, después de excluir los irrelevantes se incluyeron en la revisión 466 artículos. El número de publicaciones se incrementó dramáticamente después de 2001 (más de 10 veces). Entre los asuntos más estudiados estaban la evaluación de los patrones de prescripción (15%), la automedicación (11,3%) y las reacciones adversas (9,1%). Del total de 165 revistas, 60 tenían factor de impacto y se publicaron 125 artículos en estas revistas. Las resistencias a antimicrobianos y las reacciones adversas fueron los asuntos más citados. Conclusión: La publicación de artículos sobre el uso racional de medicamentos en Irán ha experimentado un incremento importante en la última década. Se necesitan más análisis de los resultados de la investigación para alcanzar la meta del uso racional de medicamentos (AU)

The effect of zinc sulfate in the prevention of high-dose chemotherapy-induced mucositis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of oral zinc sulfate in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, with 60 patients undergoing HSCT, divided proportionally in experimental group who received zinc sulfate, and in placebo group. They all had received high-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimen for allogenic transplantation. Oral mucositis assessed was based on World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis scale. There were no significant differences in the development of mucositis between the two groups. Severity of mucositis was not significantly different between the two groups either. The same result was obtained regarding the duration of mucositis. Zinc sulfate did not show any significant adverse effects in experimental group. In conclusion, Zinc sulfate did not have any clinical benefits in prevention or reduction of severity, and duration of high-dose chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients undergoing HSCT.